PhysioUpdate 25th January 2022


Researchers uncover 'group think' and 'gender bias' among physios discussing shoulder instability

Concerns that physiotherapists may exhibit bias towards patients because of their gender or other factors have been outlined in an article published in Physiotherapy last month.

Written by a five-person team led by Fraser Philp, a lecturer at the University of Liverpool’s school of health sciences who is a physiotherapist by background, the paper is based on an analysis of a series of facilitator-led discussions on treatment options for shoulder instability.

A total of 25 physiotherapists (18 of whom were women) from NHS trusts in the UK took part in four separate 90-minute group discussions regarding clinical vignettes involving three teenagers (two girls aged 16 and 17 and a boy of 14)

The focus groups highlighted how physiotherapy decisions can be affected by 'group think'

Existing methods of measurement in clinical assessment are limited in their ability to inform decision-making and the current terminology used lack precision ... which may affect treatment outcomes [Fraser Philp et al]

Many participants had considerable experience in the profession, varying from two to 29 years. Six held consultant posts, six held ‘advanced’ roles, 12 were specialists and one was in a rotational post. Their caseloads were mixed and most (22) had patients with shoulder instability on their caseloads. The discussions were taped and transcribed before being analysed at a later stage.

Seeting the context, the paper states that treatment regimes for paediatric shoulder instability currently favour 'conservative rehabilitation', often administered by physiotherapists, and aims to address the predominant factors contributing to the presentation. 'Surgery is not routinely considered while the patients are still developing given potential risks of damage to the bony growth plates.'

The authors found ‘considerable variation’ in how paediatric shoulder instability is assessed and managed among the particpants. ‘Classification systems, frameworks and treatment/management pathways were not widely used, possibly as a result of their complexity or limited evidence base,’ they note.

‘Existing methods of measurement in clinical assessment are limited in their ability to inform decision-making and the current terminology used lack precision. Consequently, these may negatively influence diagnostic accuracy and compound errors in decision-making which may affect treatment outcomes.’

'Potential sources of bias'

Dr Philp and his colleagues found evidence that the participants’ clinical decision-making processes were influenced by ‘potential sources of bias, most notably with reference to gender’. This refers in part to comments made in reference to the vignette of the 16-year-old girl, who was said to have been referred by her GP after a long-standing shoulder pain problem had worsened. The girl had received many physiotherapy sessions over the years for ‘managing exacerbations’.

Asked to expand on how a ‘psychosocial component’ might influence the girl’s case, participants mentioned factors such as ‘going through puberty’, ‘not coping’ with the training regime or ‘[not] wanting to do that’. Other comments included ‘family dynamic’, ‘bad times, anxiety, stresses’ and ‘problems in school or moving up’.

The authors note in a later section: ‘In these focus groups, psychosocial influences were generally perceived to be only relevant for the female vignettes.’ The prognosis was poorer for the teenage girls and 'hormonal rages going on’ were mentioned as one factor that might impede the recommended rehabilitation being carried out faithfully.

‘Whilst there was some discussion regarding psychosocial factors affecting the male vignette, these were much less frequently mentioned and centred around apprehension around restoring range post the traumatic injury,’ the authors note. But there was ‘no evidence’ that gender biased attribution of psychosocial influences was linked to a particular therapist’s gender, they conclude.

'Group think'

The authors found that decisions were not evidence based: less than half of the participants reported using any evidence-based protocols. 'Decision-making was also influenced by a series of embedded biases i.e. personal experiences, conforming to group dynamics (group think) and senior members of the department (medical hierarchy),' they note.

'Further work' required

Dr Philp and his colleagues add: ‘Further work is needed to develop methods of measurement and frameworks which can accurately identify relevant physiological mechanisms and personal factors associated with shoulder instability as a part of the assessment/diagnostic process. This may subsequently allow for appropriate treatment allocation and inform the processes surrounding rehabilitation and further management according to first principles.’

The research is part of a wider study looking at the development and use of healthcare technologies for informing clinical decision making in paediatric shoulder instability.

To access the article, titled Evaluating the clinical decision making of physiotherapists in the assessment and management of paediatric shoulder instability, visit: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.12.330



Weekly therapy sessions had been reduced at hospital placed on 'special measures' by the CQC
Therapy sessions had fallen from seven times a week to three at the hospital (stock image)

Read More


Walton Centre physios joined 'hackathon' to pave way for creation of software to aid stroke rehab
Getting to grips with VERA, an initiative that won financial backing from the Stroke Association

Read More


Want to receive newsletters?


FREE membership

Join Us

Sign up today for membership and get...

✓ Regular newsletters
✓ Full website access
✓ Sponsor Benefits

We’ll keep you connected so you’ll NEVER MISS AN UPDATE!

Join Here

Previous newsletters


PhysioUpdate 24th May 2022
PhysioUpdate 19th May 2022
PhysioUpdate 17th May 2022
PhysioUpdate 12th May 2022
PhysioUpdate 10th May 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 5th May 2022
PhysioUpdate 3rd May 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 28th April 2022
PhysioUpdate 26th April 2022
PhysioUpdate 19th April 2022
PhysioUpdate 14th April 2022
PhysioUpdate 12th April 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 7th April 2022
PhysioUpdate 5th April 2022
PhysioUpdate 31st March 2022
PhysioUpdate 29th March 2022
PhysioUpdate 22nd March 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 17th March 2022
PhysioUpdate 15th March 2022
PhysioUpdate 8th March 2022
PhysioUpdate 3rd March 2022
PhysioUpdate 1st March 2022
PhysioUpdate 22nd February 2022
PhysioUpdate 17th February 2022
PhysioUpdate 15th February 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 10th February 2022
PhysioUpdate 8th February 2022
PhysioUpdate 3rd February 2022
PhysioUpdate 1st February 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 20th January 2022
PhysioUpdate 18th January 2022
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 13th January 2022
PhysioUpdate 11th January 2022
PhysioUpdate 28th December 2021
PhysioUpdate 21st December 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 16th December 2021
PhysioUpdate 14th December 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 9th December 2021
PhysioUpdate 7th December 2021
PhysioUpdate 30th November 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 25th November 2021
PhysioUpdate 23rd November 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 18th November 2021
PhysioUpdate 16th November 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 11th November 2021
PhysioUpdate 9th November 2021
PhysioUpdate 2nd November 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 28th October 2021
PhysioUpdate 26th October 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 21st October 2021
PhysioUpdate 19th October 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 14th October 2021
PhysioUpdate 12th October 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 7th October 2021
PhysioUpdate 5th October 2021
PhysioUpdate 28th September 2021
PhysioUpdate 21st September 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 16th September 2021
PhysioUpdate 14th September 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 9th September 2021
PhysioUpdate 7th September 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 2nd September 2021
PhysioUpdate 24th August 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 19th August 2021
PhysioUpdate 17th August 2021
PhysioUpdate 3rd August 2021
PhysioUpdate 27th July 2021
PhysioUpdate 20th July 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 15th July 2021
PhysioUpdate 13th July 2021
PhysioUpdate 6th July 2021
PhysioUpdate 29th June 2021
PhysioUpdate 22nd June 2021
PhysioUpdate Suppliers News 18th June
PhysioUpdate 15th June 2021
PhysioUpdate 8th June 2021
PhysioUpdate 2nd June 2021
PhysioUpdate 4th May 2021
PhysioUpdate 27th April 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 22nd April
PhysioUpdate 6th April 2021
PhysioUpdate 30th March 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 25th March
PhysioUpdate 23rd March 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 18th March 2021
PhysioUpdate 16th March 2021
PhysioUpdate 9th March 2021
PhysioUpdate 2nd March 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 25th February
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 18th February
PhysioUpdate 16th February 2021
PhysioUpdate 2nd February 2021
PhysioUpdate Supplier News 21st January
PhysioUpdate 19th January 2021
PhysioUpdate 5th January 2021
PhysioUpdate 22nd December 2020
Industry News
9 December 2020
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.